Island of Ideas

How a Croatian Archipelago Shaped the Future of Bioethics

The Mediterranean Spark

Mali Lošinj

Imagine an Adriatic island where ancient olive groves meet cutting-edge ethical debates. Every spring since 2001, scholars from Zagreb to Seoul have converged on Mali Lošinj, transforming this Croatian haven into a global bioethics epicenter. The Lošinj Days of Bioethics began not in a university hall, but amid island breezes, symbolizing its mission to connect ethics with lived environments. By its 10th anniversary in 2011, it had catalyzed a revolutionary approach: integrative bioethics—a framework now reshaping medical, environmental, and technological ethics worldwide 1 .

The Lošinj Laboratory: Where Disciplines Collide

Philosophical Foundations

Integrative bioethics emerged here as an antidote to fragmented ethical approaches. Unlike traditional models focusing solely on medical dilemmas, Lošinj's vision embraced:

  • Pluri-perspectivity: Integrating theology, philosophy, law, and medicine 1
  • Cultural embeddedness: Weaving Mediterranean traditions of virtue ethics with global challenges
  • Practical urgency: Addressing post-communist transitions in Southeast Europe

Croatian philosopher Ante Čović championed this synthesis, arguing bioethics must become "a science of survival" (echoing Van Rensselaer Potter's original definition) .

Milestones in Lošinj's First Decade

Year Key Development Global Significance
2001 Inaugural conference with Potter's final lecture Linked bioethics to planetary health
2005 First Southeast European Bioethics Forum Established regional scholarly networks
2011 10th anniversary honoring Potter's legacy Formalized integrative bioethics framework

The Potter Connection

The 2011 conference held special poignancy, commemorating Van Rensselaer Potter (1911–2001)—the oncologist who coined "bioethics." Months before his death, he addressed Lošinj via audiovisual message, urging ethicists to confront the "new epoch" of ecological crises. His call became the conference's DNA: "Bioethics must be a bridge between science and humanities" 1 .

Experiment Spotlight: Mapping Ethical Futures

The CHANGER Project: AI as an Ethics Tool

In 2025, researchers from the University of Split leveraged Lošinj's interdisciplinary spirit to tackle a critical problem: Can AI accelerate ethics reviews for emerging technologies?

Methodology

  1. Scoping Review: Analyzed 200+ studies on Research Ethics Committees (RECs) challenges.
  2. AI-Assisted Gap Mapping: Trained algorithms to identify patterns in consent forms, privacy protocols, and policy gaps.
  3. Stakeholder Validation: Tested findings with RECs across Europe 3 .

Key Challenges in Tech Ethics Reviews (CHANGER Findings)

Challenge Frequency High-Risk Technologies
Informed consent gaps 78% AI diagnostics, genetic editing
Privacy vulnerabilities 65% Health data mining, biometrics
Transparency deficits 59% Algorithmic decision-making

Results

The team developed an interactive Evidence and Gap Map (EGM), revealing that 62% of RECs lacked tools to evaluate AI projects. Their solution—a modular review framework—reduced approval delays by 40% while enhancing risk detection 3 .

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essentials for Ethical Innovation

Pluri-perspective matrix

Maps stakeholder viewpoints

Integrative gap analysis

Identifies policy-science disconnects

Cultural hermeneutics

Interprets ethics through local customs

Lošinj's Legacy: From Adriatic to Global

Networking the Disciplines

By 2011, Lošinj had hosted scholars from 22 countries, with sessions spanning:

  • Neuroethics debates led by German philosopher Walter Schweidler 2
  • Environmental panels on "epharmology" (digital-world adaptation) 2
  • Student workshops merging art with morality 2

"Islands impose interconnection. You cannot retreat to disciplinary silos when the sea surrounds you."

Hrvoje Jurić, Organizer

Why an Island?

This ethos birthed Croatia's Centre of Excellence for Integrative Bioethics, now coordinating EU projects 1 3 .

The Mediterranean Advantage

Rooted in traditions of phronesis (practical wisdom), Lošinj's approach contrasts with principle-based Anglo-American bioethics. As Spanish ethicist Diego Gracia observed, it offers "a model where dialogue precedes dogma" .

Conclusion: Ethics as an Ecosystem

Ten years after its milestone anniversary, Lošinj's legacy is clear: bioethics thrives at intersections. From Potter's final message to AI ethics mapping, it proves that solutions emerge when disciplines collide in spaces designed for connection—whether on a Croatian island or in the "archipelago" of human knowledge. As climate and AI ethics dominate the 2020s, Lošinj's integrative compass points toward a resilient future: one where ethics isn't applied to life, but emerges from it 1 .

"No discipline alone can build the bridge to survival. We step onto it together—or not at all."

Adapted from Van Rensselaer Potter's 2001 Lošinj address

References