When we think back to our school days in science and biology classes, we often recall diagrams of the human heart, photosynthesis, or the structure of a cell. Rarely do we remember lessons questioning our moral responsibilities toward the animals we studied, dissected, or kept as pets.
Yet how we educate young minds about other species shapes the very foundation of our relationship with the natural world. In Brazilian classrooms, where science education continually evolves to address both scientific and moral demands, a silent curriculum about our ethical obligations to animals is being transmitted—often by omission rather than inclusion.
Recent research has begun to scrutinize this educational blind spot, turning attention to an unexpected source: the humble textbook. As primary vehicles of formal knowledge, these educational tools carry not just scientific facts but moral perspectives—whether their authors intend to or not. A groundbreaking analysis of Basic Education textbooks in Brazil reveals an unsettling pattern: while environmental concerns have gained traction, the ethical consideration of animals as individuals with moral worth remains largely sidelined. This article explores these findings and their profound implications for how future generations conceptualize their relationship with our planet's other inhabitants.
Understanding Animal Ethics
A human-centered perspective that views nature—including animals—primarily as a resource for human use. This worldview has deep roots in Western thought and continues to influence how we structure our societies, economies, and educational systems.
The assignment of different moral worth or rights based solely on species membership. Much like racism or sexism, speciesism involves making moral distinctions without relevant justification. In classroom contexts, this might manifest as unquestioned acceptance of harmful experimental procedures on animals.
Challenges conventional viewpoints by arguing that many non-human animals deserve moral consideration based on their capacity to experience pleasure, pain, or rich emotional lives. This perspective encourages critical thinking about topics like animal experimentation, industrial agriculture, and wildlife conservation.
How do we measure what values science education actually transmits to students? For researcher Izabel Christina Pitta Pinheiro de Souza Melgaço, the answer lay in a systematic examination of the materials that shape daily classroom instruction: textbooks. In her 2015 doctoral thesis "Animal ethics in science and biology teaching: an analysis of basic education textbooks," Melgaço embarked on a methodical investigation to evaluate how—and if—animal ethics appears in these foundational educational resources 1 .
Melgaço's approach can be broken down into several key methodological steps:
The researcher assembled a representative collection of textbooks used in Brazilian basic education, focusing specifically on science and biology materials across different grade levels.
Melgaço developed a systematic approach for identifying and categorizing content related to animal ethics. This included looking for explicit discussions of animal welfare or rights, implicit moral frameworks, treatment of controversial topics, and visual representations of animals.
Each identified instance of animal-related content was coded according to its ethical approach—whether it reflected anthropocentric, biocentric, or other ethical frameworks.
The researcher compared how different textbooks addressed similar topics, noting patterns, omissions, and representational trends across the sample.
This methodological rigor allowed Melgaço to move beyond anecdotal impressions to a substantive analysis of the values embedded in these educational materials. The approach falls within a broader research tradition known as "documentary analysis," which treats textbooks as cultural artifacts that reflect and transmit societal values—including those that often go unstated.
What did this systematic examination reveal about how textbooks present our relationship with other animals? The findings paint a concerning picture of what Melgaço describes as an unprecedented environmental crisis rooted in anthropocentric perspectives 1 .
The analysis revealed that when textbooks do address human-animal relationships, they predominantly do so through an anthropocentric lens that views animals primarily as resources for human use. This perspective was particularly evident in sections dealing with economic applications of animals, scientific experimentation, and ecological systems.
| Topic Category | Frequency of Inclusion |
|---|---|
| Animal experimentation |
|
| Wildlife conservation |
|
| Agricultural animals |
|
| Animal cognition/emotion |
|
| Ethical theories |
|
| Educational Level | Dominant Approach | Notable Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Early Science Education | Instrumental | Animals as resources; simplified moral messages |
| Middle School | Ecological | Emphasis on species and ecosystems over individuals |
| High School Biology | Increasingly complex | Some ethical discussion but limited framework |
| Teacher Training Materials | Variable | Inconsistent preparation for ethics education |
This progression suggests that students may move through their entire basic education without encountering systematic discussion of animal ethics, despite developing the cognitive capacity for such moral reasoning in their later school years.
What does it take to conduct a systematic analysis of educational materials for their ethical content?
Melgaço's research provides a model approach that can be applied across various educational contexts. The following "research toolkit" outlines key components for such an investigation:
Systematic categorization of material to identify and code all animal-related content in textbooks.
Identifying recurring patterns and themes to recognize dominant ethical frameworks.
Side-by-side evaluation of materials to compare treatment across textbooks and grade levels.
Classification system for ethical approaches to categorize content as anthropocentric, biocentric, etc.
Examination of images and illustrations to assess how animals are represented visually.
Study of language and narrative structures to identify implicit values in how topics are presented.
This methodological toolkit represents more than an academic exercise. It offers educators, curriculum developers, and researchers a structured approach to evaluating and improving how we address our moral relationship with other species in educational settings. As Albuquerque and Rocha Filho argue, deepening this aspect of science education is crucial for developing a more ethical and sustainable relationship with the natural world 2 .
The analysis of textbooks presents us with a challenging conclusion: our current science education may be inadvertently reinforcing the very anthropocentric perspectives that contribute to our environmental crises.
By largely ignoring animal ethics or presenting human dominion as unproblematic, educational materials miss a critical opportunity to foster the moral expansion that many philosophers and scientists argue is necessary for a sustainable future.
This educational gap has real-world consequences. As noted by Borges, when ethical discussions do appear in science classrooms, they tend to focus on dramatic topics like cloning and genetic manipulation while overlooking everyday ethical questions about our treatment of animals . This creates a distorted moral landscape where students may grapple with futuristic ethical dilemmas while remaining unquestioning about their daily interactions with other species.
There are promising paths forward. Research suggests that teachers with specific training in animal ethics are more likely to integrate these topics effectively into their classrooms 2 . This highlights the importance of professional development and well-designed curricular resources that provide both the philosophical foundation and practical tools for introducing animal ethics in science education.
The transformation of science education to include meaningful engagement with animal ethics represents more than just another topic to add to an overcrowded curriculum. It embodies a fundamental rethinking of how we prepare students to navigate a world facing unprecedented ecological challenges. By giving young people the conceptual tools to question anthropocentric assumptions and consider the moral standing of other species, we empower them to build not just better science, but a more compassionate and sustainable world for all its inhabitants.
References to be added manually in the final version.